********************************************************************************
MAQAO 2025.1.2 - Build information not available || 2025/07/30
/home/eoseret/MAQAO/bin/maqao oneview -R1 -WS -c=/home/eoseret/Tools/QaaS/qaas_runs/175-396-1279/intel/LAMMPS/run/oneview_runs/multicore/armclang/config.json --replace xp=/home/eoseret/Tools/QaaS/qaas_runs/175-396-1279/intel/LAMMPS/run/oneview_runs/multicore/armclang/oneview_results_1753966900 -of=html
CPY: [true] /home/eoseret/Tools/QaaS/qaas_runs/175-396-1279/intel/LAMMPS/run/oneview_runs/defaults/orig/exec --> /home/eoseret/Tools/QaaS/qaas_runs/175-396-1279/intel/LAMMPS/run/oneview_runs/multicore/armclang/oneview_results_1753966900/binaries/exec
CMD: OMP_PROC_BIND=spread OMP_DISPLAY_AFFINITY=TRUE OMP_AFFINITY_FORMAT='OMP: pid %P tid %i thread %n bound to OS proc set {%A}' OMP_DISPLAY_ENV=TRUE OMP_NUM_THREADS=1 OMP_PLACES=threads /home/eoseret/MAQAO/bin/maqao lprof _caller=oneview --xp="/home/eoseret/Tools/QaaS/qaas_runs/175-396-1279/intel/LAMMPS/run/oneview_runs/multicore/armclang/oneview_results_1753966900/tools/lprof_npsu_run_0" --mpi-command="mpirun -n 1 --bind-to core --map-by node:PE=1 --report-bindings " --collect-CPU-time-intervals --collect-topology tpp=1 -- /home/eoseret/Tools/QaaS/qaas_runs/175-396-1279/intel/LAMMPS/run/oneview_runs/multicore/armclang/oneview_results_1753966900/binaries/exec -in in.intel.eam
CMD: OMP_NUM_THREADS=1 OMP_PROC_BIND=spread OMP_DISPLAY_AFFINITY=TRUE OMP_AFFINITY_FORMAT='OMP: pid %P tid %i thread %n bound to OS proc set {%A}' OMP_DISPLAY_ENV=TRUE OMP_PLACES=threads /home/eoseret/MAQAO/bin/maqao lprof _caller=oneview --xp="/home/eoseret/Tools/QaaS/qaas_runs/175-396-1279/intel/LAMMPS/run/oneview_runs/multicore/armclang/oneview_results_1753966900/tools/lprof_npsu_run_1" --mpi-command="mpirun -n 8 --bind-to core --map-by node:PE=1 --report-bindings " --collect-CPU-time-intervals --collect-topology tpp=1 -- /home/eoseret/Tools/QaaS/qaas_runs/175-396-1279/intel/LAMMPS/run/oneview_runs/multicore/armclang/oneview_results_1753966900/binaries/exec -in in.intel.eam
CMD: OMP_NUM_THREADS=1 OMP_PROC_BIND=spread OMP_DISPLAY_AFFINITY=TRUE OMP_AFFINITY_FORMAT='OMP: pid %P tid %i thread %n bound to OS proc set {%A}' OMP_DISPLAY_ENV=TRUE OMP_PLACES=threads /home/eoseret/MAQAO/bin/maqao lprof _caller=oneview --xp="/home/eoseret/Tools/QaaS/qaas_runs/175-396-1279/intel/LAMMPS/run/oneview_runs/multicore/armclang/oneview_results_1753966900/tools/lprof_npsu_run_2" --mpi-command="mpirun -n 16 --bind-to core --map-by node:PE=1 --report-bindings " --collect-CPU-time-intervals --collect-topology tpp=1 -- /home/eoseret/Tools/QaaS/qaas_runs/175-396-1279/intel/LAMMPS/run/oneview_runs/multicore/armclang/oneview_results_1753966900/binaries/exec -in in.intel.eam
CMD: OMP_NUM_THREADS=1 OMP_PROC_BIND=spread OMP_DISPLAY_AFFINITY=TRUE OMP_AFFINITY_FORMAT='OMP: pid %P tid %i thread %n bound to OS proc set {%A}' OMP_DISPLAY_ENV=TRUE OMP_PLACES=threads /home/eoseret/MAQAO/bin/maqao lprof _caller=oneview --xp="/home/eoseret/Tools/QaaS/qaas_runs/175-396-1279/intel/LAMMPS/run/oneview_runs/multicore/armclang/oneview_results_1753966900/tools/lprof_npsu_run_3" --mpi-command="mpirun -n 24 --bind-to core --map-by node:PE=1 --report-bindings " --collect-CPU-time-intervals --collect-topology tpp=1 -- /home/eoseret/Tools/QaaS/qaas_runs/175-396-1279/intel/LAMMPS/run/oneview_runs/multicore/armclang/oneview_results_1753966900/binaries/exec -in in.intel.eam
CMD: OMP_NUM_THREADS=1 OMP_PROC_BIND=spread OMP_DISPLAY_AFFINITY=TRUE OMP_AFFINITY_FORMAT='OMP: pid %P tid %i thread %n bound to OS proc set {%A}' OMP_DISPLAY_ENV=TRUE OMP_PLACES=threads /home/eoseret/MAQAO/bin/maqao lprof _caller=oneview --xp="/home/eoseret/Tools/QaaS/qaas_runs/175-396-1279/intel/LAMMPS/run/oneview_runs/multicore/armclang/oneview_results_1753966900/tools/lprof_npsu_run_4" --mpi-command="mpirun -n 32 --bind-to core --map-by node:PE=1 --report-bindings " --collect-CPU-time-intervals --collect-topology tpp=1 -- /home/eoseret/Tools/QaaS/qaas_runs/175-396-1279/intel/LAMMPS/run/oneview_runs/multicore/armclang/oneview_results_1753966900/binaries/exec -in in.intel.eam
CMD: OMP_NUM_THREADS=1 OMP_PROC_BIND=spread OMP_DISPLAY_AFFINITY=TRUE OMP_AFFINITY_FORMAT='OMP: pid %P tid %i thread %n bound to OS proc set {%A}' OMP_DISPLAY_ENV=TRUE OMP_PLACES=threads /home/eoseret/MAQAO/bin/maqao lprof _caller=oneview --xp="/home/eoseret/Tools/QaaS/qaas_runs/175-396-1279/intel/LAMMPS/run/oneview_runs/multicore/armclang/oneview_results_1753966900/tools/lprof_npsu_run_5" --mpi-command="mpirun -n 40 --bind-to core --map-by node:PE=1 --report-bindings " --collect-CPU-time-intervals --collect-topology tpp=1 -- /home/eoseret/Tools/QaaS/qaas_runs/175-396-1279/intel/LAMMPS/run/oneview_runs/multicore/armclang/oneview_results_1753966900/binaries/exec -in in.intel.eam
CMD: OMP_NUM_THREADS=1 OMP_PROC_BIND=spread OMP_DISPLAY_AFFINITY=TRUE OMP_AFFINITY_FORMAT='OMP: pid %P tid %i thread %n bound to OS proc set {%A}' OMP_DISPLAY_ENV=TRUE OMP_PLACES=threads /home/eoseret/MAQAO/bin/maqao lprof _caller=oneview --xp="/home/eoseret/Tools/QaaS/qaas_runs/175-396-1279/intel/LAMMPS/run/oneview_runs/multicore/armclang/oneview_results_1753966900/tools/lprof_npsu_run_6" --mpi-command="mpirun -n 48 --bind-to core --map-by node:PE=1 --report-bindings " --collect-CPU-time-intervals --collect-topology tpp=1 -- /home/eoseret/Tools/QaaS/qaas_runs/175-396-1279/intel/LAMMPS/run/oneview_runs/multicore/armclang/oneview_results_1753966900/binaries/exec -in in.intel.eam
CMD: OMP_NUM_THREADS=1 OMP_PROC_BIND=spread OMP_DISPLAY_AFFINITY=TRUE OMP_AFFINITY_FORMAT='OMP: pid %P tid %i thread %n bound to OS proc set {%A}' OMP_DISPLAY_ENV=TRUE OMP_PLACES=threads /home/eoseret/MAQAO/bin/maqao lprof _caller=oneview --xp="/home/eoseret/Tools/QaaS/qaas_runs/175-396-1279/intel/LAMMPS/run/oneview_runs/multicore/armclang/oneview_results_1753966900/tools/lprof_npsu_run_7" --mpi-command="mpirun -n 56 --bind-to core --map-by node:PE=1 --report-bindings " --collect-CPU-time-intervals --collect-topology tpp=1 -- /home/eoseret/Tools/QaaS/qaas_runs/175-396-1279/intel/LAMMPS/run/oneview_runs/multicore/armclang/oneview_results_1753966900/binaries/exec -in in.intel.eam
CMD: OMP_NUM_THREADS=1 OMP_PROC_BIND=spread OMP_DISPLAY_AFFINITY=TRUE OMP_AFFINITY_FORMAT='OMP: pid %P tid %i thread %n bound to OS proc set {%A}' OMP_DISPLAY_ENV=TRUE OMP_PLACES=threads /home/eoseret/MAQAO/bin/maqao lprof _caller=oneview --xp="/home/eoseret/Tools/QaaS/qaas_runs/175-396-1279/intel/LAMMPS/run/oneview_runs/multicore/armclang/oneview_results_1753966900/tools/lprof_npsu_run_8" --mpi-command="mpirun -n 64 --bind-to core --map-by node:PE=1 --report-bindings " --collect-CPU-time-intervals --collect-topology tpp=1 -- /home/eoseret/Tools/QaaS/qaas_runs/175-396-1279/intel/LAMMPS/run/oneview_runs/multicore/armclang/oneview_results_1753966900/binaries/exec -in in.intel.eam
CMD: OMP_NUM_THREADS=1 OMP_PROC_BIND=spread OMP_DISPLAY_AFFINITY=TRUE OMP_AFFINITY_FORMAT='OMP: pid %P tid %i thread %n bound to OS proc set {%A}' OMP_DISPLAY_ENV=TRUE OMP_PLACES=threads /home/eoseret/MAQAO/bin/maqao lprof _caller=oneview --xp="/home/eoseret/Tools/QaaS/qaas_runs/175-396-1279/intel/LAMMPS/run/oneview_runs/multicore/armclang/oneview_results_1753966900/tools/lprof_npsu_run_9" --mpi-command="mpirun -n 72 --bind-to core --map-by node:PE=1 --report-bindings " --collect-CPU-time-intervals --collect-topology tpp=1 -- /home/eoseret/Tools/QaaS/qaas_runs/175-396-1279/intel/LAMMPS/run/oneview_runs/multicore/armclang/oneview_results_1753966900/binaries/exec -in in.intel.eam
CMD: OMP_NUM_THREADS=1 OMP_PROC_BIND=spread OMP_DISPLAY_AFFINITY=TRUE OMP_AFFINITY_FORMAT='OMP: pid %P tid %i thread %n bound to OS proc set {%A}' OMP_DISPLAY_ENV=TRUE OMP_PLACES=threads /home/eoseret/MAQAO/bin/maqao lprof _caller=oneview --xp="/home/eoseret/Tools/QaaS/qaas_runs/175-396-1279/intel/LAMMPS/run/oneview_runs/multicore/armclang/oneview_results_1753966900/tools/lprof_npsu_run_10" --mpi-command="mpirun -n 80 --bind-to core --map-by node:PE=1 --report-bindings " --collect-CPU-time-intervals --collect-topology tpp=1 -- /home/eoseret/Tools/QaaS/qaas_runs/175-396-1279/intel/LAMMPS/run/oneview_runs/multicore/armclang/oneview_results_1753966900/binaries/exec -in in.intel.eam
CMD: OMP_NUM_THREADS=1 OMP_PROC_BIND=spread OMP_DISPLAY_AFFINITY=TRUE OMP_AFFINITY_FORMAT='OMP: pid %P tid %i thread %n bound to OS proc set {%A}' OMP_DISPLAY_ENV=TRUE OMP_PLACES=threads /home/eoseret/MAQAO/bin/maqao lprof _caller=oneview --xp="/home/eoseret/Tools/QaaS/qaas_runs/175-396-1279/intel/LAMMPS/run/oneview_runs/multicore/armclang/oneview_results_1753966900/tools/lprof_npsu_run_11" --mpi-command="mpirun -n 88 --bind-to core --map-by node:PE=1 --report-bindings " --collect-CPU-time-intervals --collect-topology tpp=1 -- /home/eoseret/Tools/QaaS/qaas_runs/175-396-1279/intel/LAMMPS/run/oneview_runs/multicore/armclang/oneview_results_1753966900/binaries/exec -in in.intel.eam
CMD: OMP_NUM_THREADS=1 OMP_PROC_BIND=spread OMP_DISPLAY_AFFINITY=TRUE OMP_AFFINITY_FORMAT='OMP: pid %P tid %i thread %n bound to OS proc set {%A}' OMP_DISPLAY_ENV=TRUE OMP_PLACES=threads /home/eoseret/MAQAO/bin/maqao lprof _caller=oneview --xp="/home/eoseret/Tools/QaaS/qaas_runs/175-396-1279/intel/LAMMPS/run/oneview_runs/multicore/armclang/oneview_results_1753966900/tools/lprof_npsu_run_12" --mpi-command="mpirun -n 96 --bind-to core --map-by node:PE=1 --report-bindings " --collect-CPU-time-intervals --collect-topology tpp=1 -- /home/eoseret/Tools/QaaS/qaas_runs/175-396-1279/intel/LAMMPS/run/oneview_runs/multicore/armclang/oneview_results_1753966900/binaries/exec -in in.intel.eam
In run 1x1, 35 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.073167048685718% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
24 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.066176566440845% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
In run 8x1, 33 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.046304113420774% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
43 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.016061739777797% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
In run 16x1, 34 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.042878025851678% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
39 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.0084046628762736% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
In run 24x1, 34 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.045469777629478% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
29 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.0047133304469752% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
In run 32x1, 40 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.044693110045045% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
33 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.005450379103422% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
In run 40x1, 33 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.027667506874423% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
22 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.0037606319820043% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
In run 48x1, 28 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.039900439442136% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
27 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.0040168227860703% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
In run 56x1, 40 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.033210863752174% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
43 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.0060751582350349% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
In run 64x1, 43 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.039967043339857% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
27 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.003552626061719% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
In run 72x1, 37 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.046075798294623% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
37 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.0059410058165666% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
In run 80x1, 39 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.052074412233196% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
32 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.0042256087763236% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
