Help is available by moving the cursor above any 
symbol or by checking MAQAO website.
[ 4 / 4 ] Application profile is long enough (48.96 s)
To have good quality measurements, it is advised that the application profiling time is greater than 10 seconds.
[ 3 / 3 ] Most of time spent in analyzed modules comes from functions with source/debug info
-g option gives access to debugging informations, such are source locations.
[ 3.00 / 3 ] Most of time spent in analyzed modules (100.00%) comes from functions compiled with architecture specialization option -march=znver5
[ 3 / 3 ] Most of time spent in analyzed modules comes from functions with compilation options informations and -fno-omit-frame-pointer is present
-fno-omit-frame-pointer improves the accuracy of callchains found during the application profiling.
[ 3 / 3 ] Optimization level option is correctly used
[ 3 / 3 ] Host configuration allows retrieval of all necessary metrics.
[ 2 / 2 ] Application is correctly profiled ("Others" category represents 0.00 % of the execution time)
To have a representative profiling, it is advised that the category "Others" represents less than 20% of the execution time in order to analyze as much as possible of the user code
[ 1 / 1 ] Lstopo present. The Topology lstopo report will be generated.
[ 4 / 4 ] Enough time of the experiment time spent in analyzed loops (93.57%)
If the time spent in analyzed loops is less than 30%, standard loop optimizations will have a limited impact on application performances.
[ 3 / 4 ] A significant amount of threads are idle (26.52%)
On average, more than 10% of observed threads are idle. Such threads are probably IO/sync waiting. Some hints: use faster filesystems to read/write data, improve parallel load balancing and/or scheduling.
[ 3 / 4 ] CPU activity is below 90% (73.48%)
CPU cores are idle more than 10% of time. Threads supposed to run on these cores are probably IO/sync waiting. Some hints: use faster filesystems to read/write data, improve parallel load balancing and/or scheduling.
[ 4 / 4 ] Loop profile is not flat
At least one loop coverage is greater than 4% (35.73%), representing an hotspot for the application
[ 4 / 4 ] Enough time of the experiment time spent in analyzed innermost loops (56.56%)
If the time spent in analyzed innermost loops is less than 15%, standard innermost loop optimizations such as vectorisation will have a limited impact on application performances.
[ 4 / 4 ] Affinity is good (99.18%)
Threads are not migrating to CPU cores: probably successfully pinned
[ 3 / 3 ] Less than 10% (0.00%) is spend in BLAS1 operations
It could be more efficient to inline by hand BLAS1 operations
[ 3 / 3 ] Functions mostly use all threads
Functions running on a reduced number of threads (typically sequential code) cover less than 10% of the application profiled time (5.22%)
[ 3 / 3 ] Cumulative Outermost/In between loops coverage (37.01%) lower than cumulative innermost loop coverage (56.56%)
Having cumulative Outermost/In between loops coverage greater than cumulative innermost loop coverage will make loop optimization more complex
[ 2 / 2 ] Less than 10% (0.00%) is spend in BLAS2 operations
BLAS2 calls usually could make a poor cache usage and could benefit from inlining.
[ 2 / 2 ] Less than 10% (0.00%) is spend in Libm/SVML (special functions)
| Loop ID | Analysis | Penalty Score |
|---|---|---|
| ►Loop 2221 - exec | Profiled Execution Time: 35 % - Vectorization Ratio: 5.71 % - Vector Length Use: 13.04 % | |
| ►Loop Computation Issues | 2 | |
| ○ | [SA] Presence of a large number of scalar integer instructions - Simplify loop structure, perform loop splitting or perform unroll and jam. This issue costs 2 points. | 2 |
| ►Control Flow Issues | 22 | |
| ○ | [SA] Too many paths (16 paths) - Simplify control structure. There are 16 issues ( = paths) costing 1 point each with a malus of 4 points. | 20 |
| ○ | [SA] Non innermost loop (InBetween) - Collapse loop with innermost ones. This issue costs 2 points. | 2 |
| ►Vectorization Roadblocks | 22 | |
| ○ | [SA] Too many paths (16 paths) - Simplify control structure. There are 16 issues ( = paths) costing 1 point each with a malus of 4 points. | 20 |
| ○ | [SA] Non innermost loop (InBetween) - Collapse loop with innermost ones. This issue costs 2 points. | 2 |
| ○Loop 1928 - exec | Profiled Execution Time: 27 % - Vectorization Ratio: 0.00 % - Vector Length Use: 12.50 % | |
| ○Loop 2023 - exec | Profiled Execution Time: 25 % - Vectorization Ratio: 0.00 % - Vector Length Use: 12.50 % | |
| ►Loop 2437 - exec | Profiled Execution Time: 1 % - Vectorization Ratio: 7.27 % - Vector Length Use: 13.41 % | |
| ►Loop Computation Issues | 32 | |
| ○ | [SA] Presence of expensive FP instructions - Perform hoisting, change algorithm, use SVML or proper numerical library or perform value profiling (count the number of distinct input values). There are 8 issues (= instructions) costing 4 points each. | 32 |
| ►Data Access Issues | 26 | |
| ○ | [SA] Presence of constant non unit stride data access - Use array restructuring, perform loop interchange or use gather instructions to lower a bit the cost. There are 13 issues ( = data accesses) costing 2 point each. | 26 |
| ►Vectorization Roadblocks | 26 | |
| ○ | [SA] Presence of constant non unit stride data access - Use array restructuring, perform loop interchange or use gather instructions to lower a bit the cost. There are 13 issues ( = data accesses) costing 2 point each. | 26 |
| ►Loop 2443 - exec | Profiled Execution Time: 1 % - Vectorization Ratio: 7.41 % - Vector Length Use: 13.43 % | |
| ►Loop Computation Issues | 32 | |
| ○ | [SA] Presence of expensive FP instructions - Perform hoisting, change algorithm, use SVML or proper numerical library or perform value profiling (count the number of distinct input values). There are 8 issues (= instructions) costing 4 points each. | 32 |
| ►Loop 2120 - exec | Profiled Execution Time: 0 % - Vectorization Ratio: 0.00 % - Vector Length Use: 12.50 % | |
| ►Loop Computation Issues | 4 | |
| ○ | [SA] Less than 10% of the FP ADD/SUB/MUL arithmetic operations are performed using FMA - Reorganize arithmetic expressions to exhibit potential for FMA. This issue costs 4 points. | 4 |
| ►Loop 1926 - exec | Profiled Execution Time: 0 % - Vectorization Ratio: 0.00 % - Vector Length Use: 12.35 % | |
| ►Control Flow Issues | 22 | |
| ○ | [SA] Too many paths (16 paths) - Simplify control structure. There are 16 issues ( = paths) costing 1 point each with a malus of 4 points. | 20 |
| ○ | [SA] Non innermost loop (InBetween) - Collapse loop with innermost ones. This issue costs 2 points. | 2 |
| ►Vectorization Roadblocks | 22 | |
| ○ | [SA] Too many paths (16 paths) - Simplify control structure. There are 16 issues ( = paths) costing 1 point each with a malus of 4 points. | 20 |
| ○ | [SA] Non innermost loop (InBetween) - Collapse loop with innermost ones. This issue costs 2 points. | 2 |
| ►Loop 2021 - exec | Profiled Execution Time: 0 % - Vectorization Ratio: 0.00 % - Vector Length Use: 12.35 % | |
| ►Control Flow Issues | 22 | |
| ○ | [SA] Too many paths (16 paths) - Simplify control structure. There are 16 issues ( = paths) costing 1 point each with a malus of 4 points. | 20 |
| ○ | [SA] Non innermost loop (InBetween) - Collapse loop with innermost ones. This issue costs 2 points. | 2 |
| ►Vectorization Roadblocks | 22 | |
| ○ | [SA] Too many paths (16 paths) - Simplify control structure. There are 16 issues ( = paths) costing 1 point each with a malus of 4 points. | 20 |
| ○ | [SA] Non innermost loop (InBetween) - Collapse loop with innermost ones. This issue costs 2 points. | 2 |
| ►Loop 2440 - exec | Profiled Execution Time: 0 % - Vectorization Ratio: 5.63 % - Vector Length Use: 13.05 % | |
| ►Loop Computation Issues | 32 | |
| ○ | [SA] Presence of expensive FP instructions - Perform hoisting, change algorithm, use SVML or proper numerical library or perform value profiling (count the number of distinct input values). There are 8 issues (= instructions) costing 4 points each. | 32 |
| ►Control Flow Issues | 11 | |
| ○ | [SA] Too many paths (5 paths) - Simplify control structure. There are 5 issues ( = paths) costing 1 point each with a malus of 4 points. | 9 |
| ○ | [SA] Non innermost loop (InBetween) - Collapse loop with innermost ones. This issue costs 2 points. | 2 |
| ►Data Access Issues | 2 | |
| ○ | [SA] More than 20% of the loads are accessing the stack - Perform loop splitting to decrease pressure on registers. This issue costs 2 points. | 2 |
| ►Vectorization Roadblocks | 11 | |
| ○ | [SA] Too many paths (5 paths) - Simplify control structure. There are 5 issues ( = paths) costing 1 point each with a malus of 4 points. | 9 |
| ○ | [SA] Non innermost loop (InBetween) - Collapse loop with innermost ones. This issue costs 2 points. | 2 |
| ►Loop 2436 - exec | Profiled Execution Time: 0 % - Vectorization Ratio: 5.05 % - Vector Length Use: 12.94 % | |
| ►Loop Computation Issues | 24 | |
| ○ | [SA] Presence of expensive FP instructions - Perform hoisting, change algorithm, use SVML or proper numerical library or perform value profiling (count the number of distinct input values). There are 6 issues (= instructions) costing 4 points each. | 24 |
| ►Control Flow Issues | 6 | |
| ○ | [SA] Several paths (4 paths) - Simplify control structure or force the compiler to use masked instructions. There are 4 issues ( = paths) costing 1 point each. | 4 |
| ○ | [SA] Non innermost loop (InBetween) - Collapse loop with innermost ones. This issue costs 2 points. | 2 |
| ►Data Access Issues | 2 | |
| ○ | [SA] More than 20% of the loads are accessing the stack - Perform loop splitting to decrease pressure on registers. This issue costs 2 points. | 2 |
| ►Vectorization Roadblocks | 6 | |
| ○ | [SA] Several paths (4 paths) - Simplify control structure or force the compiler to use masked instructions. There are 4 issues ( = paths) costing 1 point each. | 4 |
| ○ | [SA] Non innermost loop (InBetween) - Collapse loop with innermost ones. This issue costs 2 points. | 2 |