options

exec - 2026-07-29 15:53:57 - MAQAO 2026.1.0

Help is available by moving the cursor above any symbol or by checking MAQAO website.

  • run_0

▼Code Quality  

[ 4 / 4 ] Enough time of the experiment time spent in analyzed loops (93.82%)

If the time spent in analyzed loops is less than 30%, standard loop optimizations will have a limited impact on application performances.

[ 4 / 4 ] Threads activity is good

On average, more than 95.21% of observed threads are actually active

[ 4 / 4 ] CPU activity is good

CPU cores are active 95.21% of time

[ 4 / 4 ] Loop profile is not flat

At least one loop coverage is greater than 4% (44.14%), representing an hotspot for the application

[ 4 / 4 ] Enough time of the experiment time spent in analyzed innermost loops (56.18%)

If the time spent in analyzed innermost loops is less than 15%, standard innermost loop optimizations such as vectorisation will have a limited impact on application performances.

[ 4 / 4 ] Affinity is good (98.88%)

Threads are not migrating to CPU cores: probably successfully pinned

[ 3 / 3 ] Less than 10% (0.00%) is spend in BLAS1 operations

It could be more efficient to inline by hand BLAS1 operations

[ 0 / 3 ] Too many functions do not use all threads

Functions running on a reduced number of threads (typically sequential code) cover at least 10% of the application profiled time (11.49%). Check both "Max Inclusive Time Over Threads" and "Nb Threads" in Functions or Loops tabs and consider parallelizing sequential regions or improving parallelization of regions running on a reduced number of threads

[ 3 / 3 ] Cumulative Outermost/In between loops coverage (37.64%) lower than cumulative innermost loop coverage (56.18%)

Having cumulative Outermost/In between loops coverage greater than cumulative innermost loop coverage will make loop optimization more complex

[ 2 / 2 ] Less than 10% (0.00%) is spend in BLAS2 operations

BLAS2 calls usually could make a poor cache usage and could benefit from inlining.

[ 2 / 2 ] Less than 10% (0.00%) is spend in Libm/SVML (special functions)

▼Loops Overview

Loop IDAnalysisPenalty Score
►Loop 1082 - exec+Profiled Execution Time: 44 % - Vectorization Ratio: 0.00 % - Vector Length Use: 50.00 %
►Data Access Issues+6
○[SA] Presence of constant non unit stride data access - Use array restructuring, perform loop interchange or use gather instructions to lower a bit the cost. There are 3 issues ( = data accesses) costing 2 point each.6
►Vectorization Roadblocks+6
○[SA] Presence of constant non unit stride data access - Use array restructuring, perform loop interchange or use gather instructions to lower a bit the cost. There are 3 issues ( = data accesses) costing 2 point each.6
►Loop 1081 - exec+Profiled Execution Time: 37 % - Vectorization Ratio: 0.00 % - Vector Length Use: 47.73 %
►Loop Computation Issues+2
○[SA] Presence of a large number of scalar integer instructions - Simplify loop structure, perform loop splitting or perform unroll and jam. This issue costs 2 points.2
►Control Flow Issues+4
○[SA] Several paths (2 paths) - Simplify control structure or force the compiler to use masked instructions. There are 2 issues ( = paths) costing 1 point each.2
○[SA] Non innermost loop (InBetween) - Collapse loop with innermost ones. This issue costs 2 points.2
►Data Access Issues+6
○[SA] Presence of constant non unit stride data access - Use array restructuring, perform loop interchange or use gather instructions to lower a bit the cost. There are 3 issues ( = data accesses) costing 2 point each.6
►Vectorization Roadblocks+10
○[SA] Several paths (2 paths) - Simplify control structure or force the compiler to use masked instructions. There are 2 issues ( = paths) costing 1 point each.2
○[SA] Presence of constant non unit stride data access - Use array restructuring, perform loop interchange or use gather instructions to lower a bit the cost. There are 3 issues ( = data accesses) costing 2 point each.6
○[SA] Non innermost loop (InBetween) - Collapse loop with innermost ones. This issue costs 2 points.2
○Loop 832 - execProfiled Execution Time: 5 % - Vectorization Ratio: 11.11 % - Vector Length Use: 55.56 %
○Loop 714 - execProfiled Execution Time: 4 % - Vectorization Ratio: 11.11 % - Vector Length Use: 55.56 %
►Loop 1264 - exec+Profiled Execution Time: 1 % - Vectorization Ratio: 0.00 % - Vector Length Use: 50.00 %
►Loop Computation Issues+18
○[SA] Presence of expensive FP instructions - Perform hoisting, change algorithm, use SVML or proper numerical library or perform value profiling (count the number of distinct input values). There are 4 issues (= instructions) costing 4 points each.16
○[SA] Presence of a large number of scalar integer instructions - Simplify loop structure, perform loop splitting or perform unroll and jam. This issue costs 2 points.2
►Data Access Issues+12
○[SA] Presence of constant non unit stride data access - Use array restructuring, perform loop interchange or use gather instructions to lower a bit the cost. There are 6 issues ( = data accesses) costing 2 point each.12
►Vectorization Roadblocks+12
○[SA] Presence of constant non unit stride data access - Use array restructuring, perform loop interchange or use gather instructions to lower a bit the cost. There are 6 issues ( = data accesses) costing 2 point each.12
○Loop 946 - execProfiled Execution Time: 0 % - Vectorization Ratio: 33.33 % - Vector Length Use: 66.67 %

×