********************************************************************************
MAQAO 2.21.1 - e8dbe5fa2b4bcfbd78ce7e9675bfc683121e6bf6::20250219-212851 || 2025/02/19
/scratch/users/amazouz/Tools/x86_64/maqao/maqao_x86_64_2.21.2/bin/maqao oneview -R1 -WS -c=/scratch/users/amazouz/QAAS/service/LAMMPS/174-732-6643/intel/LAMMPS/run/oneview_runs/multicore/icx/config.json --with-FLOPS --replace xp=/scratch/users/amazouz/QAAS/service/LAMMPS/174-732-6643/intel/LAMMPS/run/oneview_runs/multicore/icx/oneview_results_1747333463 -of=html
CPY: [true] /scratch/users/amazouz/QAAS/service/LAMMPS/174-732-6643/intel/LAMMPS/run/oneview_runs/defaults/orig/exec --> /scratch/users/amazouz/QAAS/service/LAMMPS/174-732-6643/intel/LAMMPS/run/oneview_runs/multicore/icx/oneview_results_1747333463/binaries/exec
CMD: OMP_NUM_THREADS=1 I_MPI_PIN_ORDER=spread OMP_DISPLAY_AFFINITY=TRUE OMP_PROC_BIND=spread OMP_AFFINITY_FORMAT='OMP: pid %P tid %i thread %n bound to OS proc set {%A}' OMP_DISPLAY_ENV=TRUE I_MPI_PIN_DOMAIN=auto I_MPI_DEBUG=4 OMP_PLACES=threads /scratch/users/amazouz/Tools/x86_64/maqao/maqao_x86_64_2.21.2/bin/maqao lprof _caller=oneview --xp="/scratch/users/amazouz/QAAS/service/LAMMPS/174-732-6643/intel/LAMMPS/run/oneview_runs/multicore/icx/oneview_results_1747333463/tools/lprof_npsu_run_0" --mpi-command="mpirun -n 6 " --collect-CPU-time-intervals -p=SSE_AVX_FLOP --collect-topology -- /scratch/users/amazouz/QAAS/service/LAMMPS/174-732-6643/intel/LAMMPS/run/oneview_runs/multicore/icx/oneview_results_1747333463/binaries/exec -in in.intel.eam -sf intel
CMD: OMP_NUM_THREADS=1 I_MPI_PIN_ORDER=spread OMP_DISPLAY_AFFINITY=TRUE OMP_PROC_BIND=spread OMP_AFFINITY_FORMAT='OMP: pid %P tid %i thread %n bound to OS proc set {%A}' OMP_DISPLAY_ENV=TRUE I_MPI_PIN_DOMAIN=auto I_MPI_DEBUG=4 OMP_PLACES=threads /scratch/users/amazouz/Tools/x86_64/maqao/maqao_x86_64_2.21.2/bin/maqao lprof _caller=oneview --xp="/scratch/users/amazouz/QAAS/service/LAMMPS/174-732-6643/intel/LAMMPS/run/oneview_runs/multicore/icx/oneview_results_1747333463/tools/lprof_npsu_run_1" --mpi-command="mpirun -n 72 " --collect-CPU-time-intervals -p=SSE_AVX_FLOP --collect-topology -- /scratch/users/amazouz/QAAS/service/LAMMPS/174-732-6643/intel/LAMMPS/run/oneview_runs/multicore/icx/oneview_results_1747333463/binaries/exec -in in.intel.eam -sf intel
CMD: OMP_NUM_THREADS=1 I_MPI_PIN_ORDER=spread OMP_DISPLAY_AFFINITY=TRUE OMP_PROC_BIND=spread OMP_AFFINITY_FORMAT='OMP: pid %P tid %i thread %n bound to OS proc set {%A}' OMP_DISPLAY_ENV=TRUE I_MPI_PIN_DOMAIN=auto I_MPI_DEBUG=4 OMP_PLACES=threads /scratch/users/amazouz/Tools/x86_64/maqao/maqao_x86_64_2.21.2/bin/maqao lprof _caller=oneview --xp="/scratch/users/amazouz/QAAS/service/LAMMPS/174-732-6643/intel/LAMMPS/run/oneview_runs/multicore/icx/oneview_results_1747333463/tools/lprof_npsu_run_2" --mpi-command="mpirun -n 96 " --collect-CPU-time-intervals -p=SSE_AVX_FLOP --collect-topology -- /scratch/users/amazouz/QAAS/service/LAMMPS/174-732-6643/intel/LAMMPS/run/oneview_runs/multicore/icx/oneview_results_1747333463/binaries/exec -in in.intel.eam -sf intel
CMD: OMP_NUM_THREADS=1 I_MPI_PIN_ORDER=spread OMP_DISPLAY_AFFINITY=TRUE OMP_PROC_BIND=spread OMP_AFFINITY_FORMAT='OMP: pid %P tid %i thread %n bound to OS proc set {%A}' OMP_DISPLAY_ENV=TRUE I_MPI_PIN_DOMAIN=auto I_MPI_DEBUG=4 OMP_PLACES=threads /scratch/users/amazouz/Tools/x86_64/maqao/maqao_x86_64_2.21.2/bin/maqao lprof _caller=oneview --xp="/scratch/users/amazouz/QAAS/service/LAMMPS/174-732-6643/intel/LAMMPS/run/oneview_runs/multicore/icx/oneview_results_1747333463/tools/lprof_npsu_run_3" --mpi-command="mpirun -n 120 " --collect-CPU-time-intervals -p=SSE_AVX_FLOP --collect-topology -- /scratch/users/amazouz/QAAS/service/LAMMPS/174-732-6643/intel/LAMMPS/run/oneview_runs/multicore/icx/oneview_results_1747333463/binaries/exec -in in.intel.eam -sf intel
CMD: OMP_NUM_THREADS=1 I_MPI_PIN_ORDER=spread OMP_DISPLAY_AFFINITY=TRUE OMP_PROC_BIND=spread OMP_AFFINITY_FORMAT='OMP: pid %P tid %i thread %n bound to OS proc set {%A}' OMP_DISPLAY_ENV=TRUE I_MPI_PIN_DOMAIN=auto I_MPI_DEBUG=4 OMP_PLACES=threads /scratch/users/amazouz/Tools/x86_64/maqao/maqao_x86_64_2.21.2/bin/maqao lprof _caller=oneview --xp="/scratch/users/amazouz/QAAS/service/LAMMPS/174-732-6643/intel/LAMMPS/run/oneview_runs/multicore/icx/oneview_results_1747333463/tools/lprof_npsu_run_4" --mpi-command="mpirun -n 126 " --collect-CPU-time-intervals -p=SSE_AVX_FLOP --collect-topology -- /scratch/users/amazouz/QAAS/service/LAMMPS/174-732-6643/intel/LAMMPS/run/oneview_runs/multicore/icx/oneview_results_1747333463/binaries/exec -in in.intel.eam -sf intel
CMD: OMP_NUM_THREADS=1 I_MPI_PIN_ORDER=spread OMP_DISPLAY_AFFINITY=TRUE OMP_PROC_BIND=spread OMP_AFFINITY_FORMAT='OMP: pid %P tid %i thread %n bound to OS proc set {%A}' OMP_DISPLAY_ENV=TRUE I_MPI_PIN_DOMAIN=auto I_MPI_DEBUG=4 OMP_PLACES=threads /scratch/users/amazouz/Tools/x86_64/maqao/maqao_x86_64_2.21.2/bin/maqao lprof _caller=oneview --xp="/scratch/users/amazouz/QAAS/service/LAMMPS/174-732-6643/intel/LAMMPS/run/oneview_runs/multicore/icx/oneview_results_1747333463/tools/lprof_npsu_run_5" --mpi-command="mpirun -n 144 " --collect-CPU-time-intervals -p=SSE_AVX_FLOP --collect-topology -- /scratch/users/amazouz/QAAS/service/LAMMPS/174-732-6643/intel/LAMMPS/run/oneview_runs/multicore/icx/oneview_results_1747333463/binaries/exec -in in.intel.eam -sf intel
CMD: OMP_NUM_THREADS=1 I_MPI_PIN_ORDER=spread OMP_DISPLAY_AFFINITY=TRUE OMP_PROC_BIND=spread OMP_AFFINITY_FORMAT='OMP: pid %P tid %i thread %n bound to OS proc set {%A}' OMP_DISPLAY_ENV=TRUE I_MPI_PIN_DOMAIN=auto I_MPI_DEBUG=4 OMP_PLACES=threads /scratch/users/amazouz/Tools/x86_64/maqao/maqao_x86_64_2.21.2/bin/maqao lprof _caller=oneview --xp="/scratch/users/amazouz/QAAS/service/LAMMPS/174-732-6643/intel/LAMMPS/run/oneview_runs/multicore/icx/oneview_results_1747333463/tools/lprof_npsu_run_6" --mpi-command="mpirun -n 168 " --collect-CPU-time-intervals -p=SSE_AVX_FLOP --collect-topology -- /scratch/users/amazouz/QAAS/service/LAMMPS/174-732-6643/intel/LAMMPS/run/oneview_runs/multicore/icx/oneview_results_1747333463/binaries/exec -in in.intel.eam -sf intel
CMD: OMP_NUM_THREADS=1 I_MPI_PIN_ORDER=spread OMP_DISPLAY_AFFINITY=TRUE OMP_PROC_BIND=spread OMP_AFFINITY_FORMAT='OMP: pid %P tid %i thread %n bound to OS proc set {%A}' OMP_DISPLAY_ENV=TRUE I_MPI_PIN_DOMAIN=auto I_MPI_DEBUG=4 OMP_PLACES=threads /scratch/users/amazouz/Tools/x86_64/maqao/maqao_x86_64_2.21.2/bin/maqao lprof _caller=oneview --xp="/scratch/users/amazouz/QAAS/service/LAMMPS/174-732-6643/intel/LAMMPS/run/oneview_runs/multicore/icx/oneview_results_1747333463/tools/lprof_npsu_run_7" --mpi-command="mpirun -n 192 " --collect-CPU-time-intervals -p=SSE_AVX_FLOP --collect-topology -- /scratch/users/amazouz/QAAS/service/LAMMPS/174-732-6643/intel/LAMMPS/run/oneview_runs/multicore/icx/oneview_results_1747333463/binaries/exec -in in.intel.eam -sf intel
CMD: OMP_NUM_THREADS=1 I_MPI_PIN_ORDER=spread OMP_DISPLAY_AFFINITY=TRUE OMP_PROC_BIND=spread OMP_AFFINITY_FORMAT='OMP: pid %P tid %i thread %n bound to OS proc set {%A}' OMP_DISPLAY_ENV=TRUE I_MPI_PIN_DOMAIN=auto I_MPI_DEBUG=4 OMP_PLACES=threads /scratch/users/amazouz/Tools/x86_64/maqao/maqao_x86_64_2.21.2/bin/maqao lprof _caller=oneview --xp="/scratch/users/amazouz/QAAS/service/LAMMPS/174-732-6643/intel/LAMMPS/run/oneview_runs/multicore/icx/oneview_results_1747333463/tools/lprof_npsu_run_8" --mpi-command="mpirun -n 216 " --collect-CPU-time-intervals -p=SSE_AVX_FLOP --collect-topology -- /scratch/users/amazouz/QAAS/service/LAMMPS/174-732-6643/intel/LAMMPS/run/oneview_runs/multicore/icx/oneview_results_1747333463/binaries/exec -in in.intel.eam -sf intel
CMD: OMP_NUM_THREADS=1 I_MPI_PIN_ORDER=spread OMP_DISPLAY_AFFINITY=TRUE OMP_PROC_BIND=spread OMP_AFFINITY_FORMAT='OMP: pid %P tid %i thread %n bound to OS proc set {%A}' OMP_DISPLAY_ENV=TRUE I_MPI_PIN_DOMAIN=auto I_MPI_DEBUG=4 OMP_PLACES=threads /scratch/users/amazouz/Tools/x86_64/maqao/maqao_x86_64_2.21.2/bin/maqao lprof _caller=oneview --xp="/scratch/users/amazouz/QAAS/service/LAMMPS/174-732-6643/intel/LAMMPS/run/oneview_runs/multicore/icx/oneview_results_1747333463/tools/lprof_npsu_run_9" --mpi-command="mpirun -n 240 " --collect-CPU-time-intervals -p=SSE_AVX_FLOP --collect-topology -- /scratch/users/amazouz/QAAS/service/LAMMPS/174-732-6643/intel/LAMMPS/run/oneview_runs/multicore/icx/oneview_results_1747333463/binaries/exec -in in.intel.eam -sf intel
CMD: OMP_NUM_THREADS=1 I_MPI_PIN_ORDER=spread OMP_DISPLAY_AFFINITY=TRUE OMP_PROC_BIND=spread OMP_AFFINITY_FORMAT='OMP: pid %P tid %i thread %n bound to OS proc set {%A}' OMP_DISPLAY_ENV=TRUE I_MPI_PIN_DOMAIN=auto I_MPI_DEBUG=4 OMP_PLACES=threads /scratch/users/amazouz/Tools/x86_64/maqao/maqao_x86_64_2.21.2/bin/maqao lprof _caller=oneview --xp="/scratch/users/amazouz/QAAS/service/LAMMPS/174-732-6643/intel/LAMMPS/run/oneview_runs/multicore/icx/oneview_results_1747333463/tools/lprof_npsu_run_10" --mpi-command="mpirun -n 256 " --collect-CPU-time-intervals -p=SSE_AVX_FLOP --collect-topology -- /scratch/users/amazouz/QAAS/service/LAMMPS/174-732-6643/intel/LAMMPS/run/oneview_runs/multicore/icx/oneview_results_1747333463/binaries/exec -in in.intel.eam -sf intel
In run 6x1, 22 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.019949757595896% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
72 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.059336674894439% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
In run 72x1, 47 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.045846122258808% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
109 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.02347439002915% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
In run 96x1, 46 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.047282110754168% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
53 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.012195351286209% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
In run 120x1, 49 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.057185801910236% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
38 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.0037956808810122% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
In run 126x1, 50 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.046874871572072% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
39 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.003792524090386% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
In run 144x1, 51 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.058161189430393% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
32 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.0024313941903529% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
In run 168x1, 51 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.056504168293031% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
39 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.0029647637566086% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
In run 192x1, 56 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.052980103988375% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
57 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.0040850638761185% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
In run 216x1, 54 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.045564385509351% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
46 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.0031859553128015% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
In run 240x1, 55 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.04678813681312% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
49 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.0031958206163836% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
In run 256x1, 54 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.043999712779623% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
55 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.0032766160547908% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
